Sunday, December 17, 2017

Supply chain solutions - it's not rocket scence

Two trucks converging from the main road and an off-ramp heading up Wainuiomata Hill this morning epitomised to me the ironies of our modern food systems. One was a Meadow Fresh truck, no doubt taking refrigerated goods to the supermarket or dairies over the hill, the other was a large Waste Management truck. One heavy vehicle to truck in processed, packaged food; the other to take out all the waste packaging. Both powered by greenhouse gas producing fossil fuels.

I know that's simplistic - the Waste Management truck will be taking out lots of other forms of waste (though how much is 'necessary' in the long run, who knows); and perhaps some of the packaging the Meadow Fresh truck was bringing in will be recycled or reused - perhaps.

But the main point is we have these massive, complex, industrialised and segmented 'food' production, transport and consumption systems; such that end consumers don't have any idea what impact their use is having on our world. Quite frankly, most probably don't want to.

I live in a suburb just north of a main industrial centre in Lower Hutt, and regularly see trucks going over the river (Te Awa Kairangi), from an international logistics company bearing the slogan "Supply Chain Solutions". Our supply chain solutions in regard to food, in my humble opinion, lie a lot closer to home and more down to earth.

A multitude of climate change and environmental problems would be lessened if more of us - those capable of doing so - grew more of our own food, or made it ourselves. If you get the right ingredients - it'll be healthier too. Grow things like potatoes, cabbages, tomatoes - rocket even. That will spice up your life. If you don't have a garden plot yourself, check around for a community garden, or find others in the community who can help: maybe a plot share with someone else who can't fully utilised their own backyard. The possibilities are endless - and growing.

The Guardian newspaper says, while both agriculture and transport each contribute about 15 percent of total global carbon emissions, "when land conversion and the wider food system are taken into account the total contribution of food may be as high as 30 percent". 

Yes, I speak from my own place in the midst of this interconnected web of production and consumption. We buy a lot of packaged, processed food, including much from overseas; but we do grow some veges - including a promising patch of potatoes this year, bake our own bread occassionally; and my wife, for cost reasons, beats our own butter from cream from a local organic producer. We even make gourmet pizzas which outclasses those from Dominoes and Hell. In the product mix - we're not perfect, but occasionally strike through to a better way.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Wai not?

This week, the government announced a new target to have 90 per cent of New Zealand's lakes and rivers reach ‘swimmable’ water quality standards by 2040 – up from 72 per cent now. Critics have said they’re just shifting the goalposts for defining a river as ‘swimmable’.

Personally, on a quick dip into news items, I got lost among the figures bandied round, with the news item above saying “the target will be based on meeting the water quality standard at least 80 per cent of the time”. While Nick Smith on National Radio defended criticism that people stood a 1 in 20 chance of getting sick in some swimmable rivers, by saying that that was only 15 per cent of the time (in those rivers). People were confusing percentiles with medians, he said.

Personally, being a purist and Idealist, never mind percentiles and medians. Why not keep our goals simple, go the whole hog, and live up to our “100% pure” brand name. From my heartland, Waikato-Tainui iwi‘s vision for the Waikato River is one of complete restoration. Their Environmental Plan, Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato, seeks “The restoration of water quality within the Waikato River so that it is safe for people to swim in and take food from over its entire length.”

Why not? I say. Why shouldn’t our rivers and streams all be restored to such a state as to provide vitality and sustenance to people. They’re meant to provide us with food and water, not discharge channels. We were designed to live in harmony with the earth. Though we have strayed far from the course, I believe it is possible – and necessary – to strive for that harmony again.

In the meantime, I’m off to take a dip in my local river – the Hutt/Te Awa Kairangi, in the lowest category of ‘swimmable’. Never mind, I’ll just keep my head above water.